Sure, it makes sense to look at the graph and perhaps more importantly, hit delay. I mean, why not. But, consider this: If someone did a study, picking the best looking GATs from panorama (after a thorough scan) vs random tables (same scan), do you believe the human or computer chosen "best GATs" wo...
Just did a really quick back-test, found a beautiful GAT table, updated draws (RF5), result: Two 4-hits. Problem is, there were very similar tables right next to it that did not perform. Not at all. No manual or automated process would be able pick the good GAT over the other tables. In the end, one...
Standard procedure: We target a more realistic hit, then play according to the 100/X rule. Typical percentages for a 6/49 game (12n): 3-hits 33%, 4-hits 12%. That would RF 3 and RF 8 (plus 1-2 extra rounds). There are always early GATs or ugly graphs that suddenly win big, that's life. My advice: Wi...
Here it is. My first attempt at a basic video tutorial. Be kind. Total production time was less than 15 minutes. What does it show? Basic usage with very strict settings (14 numbers only, cat. 3+4). I'm calling it version 0.8, because there are many issues. Future videos should focus on GAT selectio...