Re: History Performance in original order too
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:56 pm
Generally speaking the GAT application will provide better results overall. The online system is a best effort attempt to make scans in a limited time to make results available. It would be strange if it was the other way around. I cannot suggest what settings to use in GAT as is. Given each game is sort of unique, some user testing would be required. Typically the default values are good to begin with but that doesn't mean there are no better settings. The normal "go to pick" panorama is the augmentative; this also incorporates the hits + delay information. If you observe better results using the Hits + delay panorama, then go for it. If there was one "best to use" option, there would be no other options.